The effect of ischemic preconditioning on the of anaerobic performance in female student's athletes

Sharifi Moghadam, Akram; Naserkhani, Faezeh

doi:10.52547/joeppa.12.2.1

The effect of ischemic preconditioning on the of anaerobic performance in female student's athletes

Document Type : original article

Authors

¹ 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

² Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, Shahroud University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

10.52547/joeppa.12.2.1

Abstract

Abstract
Purpose: Recently, effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in sports as an ergogenic aid is taken into consideration. IPC may have positive effects on the athletic performance of individuals, which leads to increased capacity in exercise. So, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of IPC on anaerobic performance of female student›s athletes.
Methods: For this purpose, in a randomized crossover design, sixteen females with a mean age of 0.60±20.78 years and weight 10.03±55.94 kg assigned into two conditions: Experiment (preconditioning included four set of five-minute occlusion-reperfusion, with five minutes reperfusion, then performing two Wingate tests) and Control (sham preconditioning included four set of five-minutes closing cuff without pressure, then performing two Wingate tests). The rest period between two Wingate tests was two minutes. Borg scale were measured immediately after the last stage of ischemia and Wingate test. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and LSD test significance level was P <0.05.
Results: The results showed that the peak power increased in experimental condition compared to the control, but this increase was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Also, there was no significant difference in average power, mean power and heart rate between control and experimental condition (P>0.05). IPC lead to significant decrease in the perceived exertion in experimental condition (p˂0.05).
Conclusion: Results showed that the IPC has no effect on power output in female student›s athletes. It seems, IPC before power tasks in female student›s athletes, must be with more intensity and time and in big organs with a larger muscle size to have more effects.

Keywords

References

1. Tokish JM, Kocher MS, Hawkins RJ. Ergogen􀍲
ic aids: a review of basic science, performance,
side effects, and status in sports. Am J Sports
Med. 2004; 32: 1543-53.
2. De Groot PC, Thijssen DH, Sanchez M, El􀍲
lenkamp R, Hopman MT. Ischemic precondi􀍲
tioning improves maximal performance in hu􀍲
mans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 108(1): 141-6.
3.Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Precon􀍲
ditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell
injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation.
1986; 74: 1124-1136.
4.Yellon DM, Downey JM. Preconditioning the
myocardium: from cellular physiology to clin􀍲
ical cardiology. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83, 1113-
1151.
5.Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Remote ischaemic
preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and
clinical application. Cardiovascular Research.
2008; 79: 377-86.
6.Crisafulli A, Tangianu F, Tocco F, Concu A, Ma􀍲
meli O, Mulliri G, et al. Ischemic precondition􀍲
ing of the muscle improves maximal exercise
performance but not maximal oxygen uptake
in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111(2): 530-6.
7.Crisafulli A, Mancardi D, Marongiu E, Ras􀍲
taldoR, Penna C, Pagliaro P. Preconditioning
cardioprotection and exercise performance:
a radical point of view. Sport Sci Health 2015;
11: 137-151.
8.Katori M, Anselmo DM, Busuttil RW,
Kupiec-Weglinski JW. A novel strategy against
ischaemiaand reperfusion injury: cytoprotec􀍲
tion with heme oxygenase system, Transpl.
Immunol. 2002; 9(2): 227-233.
9.Kraus A, Pasha E, Machin D, Kloner R. Bilat􀍲
eral Upper Limb Remote Ischemic Precondi􀍲
tioning Improves Peak Anaerobic Power. Sport
Med. 2015; 9: 1-6.
10.Kuzuya T, Hoshida S, Yamashita N, Fuji H, Oe
H, Hori M, et al. Delayed effects of sublethal
ischaemiaon the acquisition of tolerance to is􀍲
chaemia. Circ.Res. 1993; 72(6), 1293-1299.
11.Sato y. The history and future of KAATSU
Training. Int. J. Kaatsu Training Res. 2005; 1:
1-5.
12.Dirnagl U, Simon RP, Hallenbeck JM.Is􀍲
chemic tolerance and endogenous neuropro􀍲
tection. Trends Neurosci. 2003; 26(5): 248-54.
13.Correia SC, Santos RX, Perry G, Zhu X,
Moreira PI, Smith MA. Mitochondria: the miss􀍲
ing link between preconditioning and neuro􀍲
protection. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010; 20: 475-85.
14.Patterson SD, Bezodis NE, Glaister M, et
al. The effect of ischemic preconditioning on
repeated sprint cycling performance. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 2015; 47: 1652-8.
15.Jean-St-Michel E, Manlhiot C, Li J. Remote
preconditioning improves maximal perfor􀍲
mance in highly trained athletes. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(7): 1280-6.
16.Clevidence MW, Mowery RE, Kushnick MR.
The effects of ischemic preconditioning on aerobic and anaerobic variables associated
with submaximal cycling performance. Eur J
Appl Physiol. 2012; 112(10): 3649-54.
17.Gibson N, White J, Neish M. Effect of Is􀍲
chemic Preconditioning on Land-Based Sprint􀍲
ing in Team-Sport Athletes. Int J Sports Physi􀍲
ol and Perform. 2013; 8, 671-676.
18.Lalonde F, Poirier P, Arvisais D. Exercise-in􀍲
duced ischemic preconditioning and the po􀍲
tential application to cardiac rehabilitation: a
systematic review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev.
2014; 35: 93-102.
19.Powers SK, Jackson MJ. Exercise-induced
oxidative stress: cellular mechanisms and im􀍲
pact on muscle force production. Physiol Rev.
2008; 88(5): 1243-76.
20.Hoffman J, Epstein S, Einbinder M, Wein􀍲
stein Y. A Comparison Between the Wingate
Anaerobic Power Test to Both Vertical Jump
and Line Drill Tests in Basketball Players. Jour􀍲
nal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
2000, 14(3), 261–264.
21.Arslan, C. Relationship between the 30-sec􀍲
ond Wingate test and characteristics of iso􀍲
metric and explosive leg strength in young
subjects. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(3):658–
666. 2005.
22. Cooper S-M, Baker J S, E Eaton Z, Matthews
N. A simple multistage field test for the pre􀍲
diction of anaerobic capacity in female games
players. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:784– 789.
Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(7): 1280-6.
23.Saghebjoo M, Zahed Abolhasani M, Bahari
Fard R, Yaghubi A. The Acute Effects of Differ􀍲
ent Static and Dynamic Stretch protocols on
the Wingate Power Test Performance. Olym􀍲
pics. 2013; 21(36): 73-86. [In Persian]
24.Adams, Gene M. Sports Physiology Labo􀍲
ratory Guide. Translation by Dr. Rahmaninia,
Hamid Rajabi, Abbas Ali Gayani, Hossein Mo􀍲
jtahedi. Hatami Publishing, Tehran, Iran.2013,
161. [In Persian]
25.Hittinger E.A, Maher JL, Nash M.S, Perry
A.C, Joseph F, et al. Ischemic preconditioning
does not improve peak exercise capacity at
sea level or simulated high altitude in trained
male cyclists. Applied Physiology, Nutrition,
and Metabolism, 2015, 40(1): 65-71
26.Abe T, Fujita S, Nakajima T, Sakamaki M,
Ozaki H, Ogasawara R, et al. Effects of low-in􀍲
tensity cycle training with restricted leg blood
flow on thigh muscle volume and VO2max in
young men. J Sports Sci Med. 2010; 9(2): 452-
458.
27.Gibson N, Mahony B, Tracey C. Effect of
ischemic preconditioning on repeated sprint
ability in team sport athletes. J Sports Sci.
2015; 33: 1182-8.
28.Sabbagh S, Henry Salzman MM, Kloner RA,
Simkhovich BZ, Rezkalla SH. Remote ischem􀍲
ic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass
graft operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;
96(2): 727-36.
29.Bailey TG, Jones H, Gregson W, Atkinson
G, Cable NT, Thijssen DH. Effect of ischemic
preconditioning on lactate accumulation and
running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
2012; 44(11): 2084-9. 30.Barbosa TC, Machado AC, Braz ID. Remote
ischemic preconditioning delays fatigue devel􀍲
opment during handgrip exercise. Scand J Med
Sci Sports. 2015; 25: 356-64.
31.Laskowski R. Training loads and physical
capacity in female practicing judo. Gda´nsk:
Awﬁs. 2007; 5(6): 15-24.